Three Newly Elected Democrats in Manlius, NY Reject Bible When Taking Oath January 7, 2020

Three Newly Elected Democrats in Manlius, NY Reject Bible When Taking Oath

Last November, four liberals won seats on the Manlius Town Board in New York, flipping it back to Democratic control and giving them a 5-1 advantage on the committee. (It was a 5-1 Republican advantage before the elections.)

Huge change, obviously, and the result of a grassroots campaign that focused on the need for more transparency at meetings and more public involvement.

Last week, when those new members were sworn into office, they showed just how difference this board would be when three of them chose not to take their oath on a Bible. They took their oaths on the town book of codes instead.

Elizabeth Doran at Syracuse.com explains:

John Deer, Elaine Denton and Heather Waters each chose to put their hand on the codes book for the swearing in ceremony on Dec. 30 in the town hall. The fourth Democrat, Katelyn Kriesel, stuck with the Bible, as did other town officials sworn in.

Why not use the Bible?

Deer said he decided not to use a Bible because he is an atheist, and also because he believes in the separation of church and state.

“I just thought it was the right thing to do,” he said.

Waters also said separation of church and state is what motivated her to use a text other than the Bible.

Denton said she used the codes book because she took an oath to represent the people, and using the codes book “seemed more appropriate for me.”

By making that transition together, they also took heat off of any one person who might have done it on his or her own. Watch the video. When it’s announced that John Deer is not using a Bible around the 3:00 mark, you hear someone in the crowd yell out, “Love it!”

It’s a welcome move. We need more elected officials to follow their lead and swear in on a book that’s meaningful to them and relevant to the office they now hold. If the Bible is your guiding book in a government role, you’re not doing your job very well.

(Thanks to Brian for the link)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!