There’s a nice profile in The Guardian today, by Washington correspondent David Smith, of Rep. Jared Huffman, the only non-religious member of Congress. In 2017, he announced that he was a Humanist — and it became “politically official” this past April.
If you’re already familiar with his story, you won’t find anything revealing in there, but two quotations definitely stand out. The first is whether or not Donald Trump is a “secret atheist.” Even though he has surrounded himself with conservative Christians and tried, pathetically, to pass himself off as a devout man, some people have speculated that he’s not religious at all. What does Huffman say about that?
Asked if he suspects Trump himself is a secret atheist, Huffman said: “I think he’s a narcissist. He worships himself.”
Truer words have never been spoken. I don’t think he’s an atheist, for what it’s worth. If anything, I might call him an apatheist. He doesn’t think about religion at all because he doesn’t think, period. He’s lazy and ignorant, not actively non-religious — or anything else, for that matter.
The other line that caught my attention was when Huffman was asked if he’s the only non-religious member of Congress. On paper, that’s true (though Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema is technically “Unaffiliated”), but Huffman suggested there were others just like him.
“I have many fellow travellers, very few publicly. I think there’s still fear of this conventional wisdom that being an atheist or agnostic or a non-believer is somehow the worst possible thing in politics. My experience has been that that’s not the case, but how you do it matters.”
I’m surprised the article didn’t even mention that Huffman is one of the chairs of the Congressional Freethought Caucus, which currently includes ten members. If anyone’s going to come out as non-religious, you’d think it’d be one of them. Still, the piece is a good introduction to Huffman. You can see why being open about his atheism hasn’t affected his standing among constituents. He talks about it as one of many traits, not the biggest thing that defines him, and he’s certainly not anti-religious. When you speak about religion that way, it really blunts the political repercussions.