Despite Court Order, Alaskan Borough Still Uses Discriminatory Invocation Policy October 25, 2018

Despite Court Order, Alaskan Borough Still Uses Discriminatory Invocation Policy

In early 2016, members of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly in Alaska were thinking about getting rid of invocations at meetings… but they kept them and said anyone who wanted to give one could do so.

Hearing that invitation, a member of The Satanic Temple signed up. She delivered an invocation that included the line, “That which will not bend must break and that which can be destroyed by truth should never be spared its demise. It is done. Hail Satan.”

That didn’t sit well with some of the Assembly members for some reason, so they voted 6-3 in favor of changing the rules. They didn’t eliminate the invocations, but they put in place new rules limiting speakers to members of “Assembly-approved religious association.”

As the new resolution spells out, those eligible to recite an invocation include religious associations “with an established presence in the Kenai Peninsula Borough that regularly meet for the primary purpose of sharing a religious perspective, or chaplains who may serve one or more of the fire departments, law enforcement agencies, hospitals, or other similar organizations in the borough.”

Saying that only members of “established” groups could give the invocations effectively shut out atheists, Satanists, and religious minorities that didn’t have money for a building or rental space. This was only a step away from saying only Christians could deliver the invocations, and it was still illegal.

The policy changed a handful of times in the weeks to follow. They even undid that policy… only to reverse themselves after an atheist gave an invocation.

In December of 2016, the ACLU of Alaska decided enough was enough. They filed a lawsuit against the Kenai Peninsula Borough.

… [The lawsuit was filed] on behalf of Lance Hunt and Iris Fontana, two Borough residents who are standing up to challenge the Borough Assembly’s unconstitutional restrictions on who may offer invocations at the beginning of the Assembly’s public meetings.

Hunt is an atheist whose first invocation request was accepted when the policy was inclusive, but whose second request was denied when that policy changed. Fontana is the Satanist who gave the invocation in the video above; she was also denied a chance to speak when the policy changed.

The lawsuit claimed the Borough was violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and the Establishment Clause by “favoring some religious practices over other religious practices, and from favoring religion over non-religion.” It also said the policy violated the plaintiffs’ freedom of speech and freedom of association.

Here’s the good news: A Superior Court found that the borough’s policy was unconstitutional earlier this month.

“The Resolution is inclusive of tax-exempt religious association(s) serving residents of the borough. It is not inclusive of every religious view or belief practiced by the residents of the Kenai Peninsula Borough,” the court decision states. “Plaintiffs Hunt, Fontana, and Boyer are all examples of borough residents whose religions values are excluded and disfavored by the Resolution.”

The bad news? No one on the council seems to give a damn about the decision. For the past two meetings since the decision came down, there has been a religious invocation, in violation of both the law and the recent court order.

The borough’s resolution allows a chaplain serving the military, law enforcement agencies, fire departments, hospitals or other similar organizations to give invocations before Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly meetings, as well as people who are members of a religious organization with an “established presence” in the borough that meets regularly.

Tuesday’s invocation was given by Borough Assembly President Wayne Ogle, who gave thanks to “Father God” and offered a number of prayers.

So they aren’t abiding by the law because… no reason. They just don’t feel like it. They haven’t said they’re appealing the decision, but even if they did, they’re still required to abide by the law in the interim. The ACLU has good reason to keep pursuing this case and force the end of the prayer policy — at some point, taxpayers will realize their elected officials are just throwing away money for no good reason.

(Large portions of this article were published earlier. Thanks to Brian for the link)

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!