ACLU: Kentucky’s “Bible Literacy” Classes Frequently Indoctrinate Students January 10, 2018

ACLU: Kentucky’s “Bible Literacy” Classes Frequently Indoctrinate Students

Last summer, when Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin signed a law allowing elective Bible courses in public schools, a lot of church/state separation advocates were worried, and for good reason. They wanted to know how the state planned to prevent these classes from turning into indoctrination seminars.

The classes themselves weren’t illegal, as long as they were taught objectively, but this was Kentucky, and Bevin has never shied away from pushing his faith on the people he represents. So there was reason to be concerned.


And guess what?

The ACLU of Kentucky, after reviewing classroom materials they received via the Freedom of Information Act, now says these classes frequently cross the line.


In a letter sent Friday to the Kentucky Department of Education, the ACLU urged state officials to warn districts about the violations and give them more guidance as to how these classes should be taught. If they don’t, lawsuits may be coming. And they gave specific examples of the violations.

The investigation uncovered public school teachers using the Bible to impart religious life lessons (Barren, McCracken, and Letcher Counties), use of online Sunday School lessons and worksheets for course source material and assignments (Letcher and Wayne Counties), and rote memorization of Biblical text (McCracken County) — practices which fall far short of academic and objective study of the Bible and its historical context or literary value.

Those classes sound more like what you’d expect to find in Sunday School, not a public school.

As for the memorization, Brian Harper, the superintendent of McCracken County schools, said it wasn’t a big deal: Kids memorize poetry, too. But the ACLU notes that these classes had kids memorize 2 Corinthians 12:10 and Psalm 23, without ever probing “any deeper into an academic or intellectual understanding of the Bible and its influences.” (Memorizing poetry is pointless without that deeper understanding of the text, too.)

In another county, kids watched the movie God’s Not Dead 2 in class.

The most egregious example, though, was the teacher who, given no guidance as to what she needed to teach, just asked the students what they wanted to learn. She spent the course answering their questions. Among the items on their list?

Is there evidence to support the Bible and all of the stories within it?

Dinosaurs and mythological creatures, what does the Bible say about them?

Does Christianity influence other religions and if so how?

The Ark Adventure in Kentucky — can we go see it?

This is why you don’t let kids dictate what you teach in class… and this is what happens when bad teachers are left to fend for themselves because the state gives them no guidance about how to properly teach these classes.

The ACLU of Kentucky made clear to state officials that these violations could lead to lawsuits if the state didn’t step in to issue warnings and offer more structure:

it is inappropriate and unconstitutional to use public-school educational courses to teach the Bible as truth or from a religious perspective, or to use such courses to disparage other faiths.

we urge you to put in place mechanisms for monitoring these courses as they are implemented to ensure that they do not run afoul of the students’ and parents’ constitutional rights. Otherwise, schools will likely face costly and drawn-out litigation, among other consequences.

This is why teaching Bible-specific courses in high school is such a horrible idea. The teachers usually have no qualifications other than being Christian, which means many are predisposed to teach whatever they’re used to seeing at their own churches. It’s not objective. It’s not academic. It’s just indoctrination.

Matt Bevins may not care, but the courts will.

(Image via Shutterstock. Thanks to Brian for the link)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!