Bakery Ad Replacing Jesus with Sausage Roll in Nativity Isn’t “Anti-Christian” November 16, 2017

Bakery Ad Replacing Jesus with Sausage Roll in Nativity Isn’t “Anti-Christian”

U.K.-based bakery Greggs had to issue an interesting apology after conservative Christians threatened to boycott the establishment for replacing baby Jesus with a sausage roll in an advertisement using the Nativity scene.


The controversial ad features the three magi surrounding the sausage roll, which has a bite taken out of it. The delicious Nativity scene was meant to promote the company’s advent calendar.

Many believers called the image “anti-Christian” and called for people to boycott Greggs, while some implied the company’s management would be killed if they joked about Islam in a similar way.

Others, however, saw the humor in the ad.

Twitter users spanned the spectrum, with some using the opportunity to make jokes about how a Greggs sausage roll “does taste like it was entombed in a cave for 3 days” and others saying the ad campaign made them think more highly of the company.

It doesn’t seem like many people were truly offended, though. Most seemed to exhibit a sort of faux-outrage that was then directed at Islam.

So, are these people actually offended or are they just using any excuse to be “the victim” and/or attack Islam? It’s hard to tell.

What we do know is that it was clearly the company’s intention to be funny and not to offend the very Christians they’re marketing to with their advent calendar. It’s also clear the joke was considered a step too far by some.

Still, Greggs apologized for offending people in a statement, according to the Telegraph.

“We’re really sorry to have caused any offence, this was never our intention.”

I don’t mind the apology, especially to those whose feelings were unnecessarily hurt, but the advertisement itself was hardly “anti-Christian.” The entire purpose of the image was to promote a calendar which provides gift cards and vouchers for baked goods each day leading up to Christmas. Why would they intentionally alienate their exact target audience? That wouldn’t make sense even from a business perspective.

Another image promoting the advent calendar said “Merry Greggsmas” and included a picture of a pastry in Santa Claus packaging. Is that one offensive, too?


If the first image is anti-Christian, this one must be anti-Santa, but no one seems mad this time around.

(Images via Greggs)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!