SPLC Faces Backlash After Naming Two Courageous Critics of Islam to “Anti-Muslim Extremists” List October 28, 2016

SPLC Faces Backlash After Naming Two Courageous Critics of Islam to “Anti-Muslim Extremists” List

The backlash has been fierce since the Southern Poverty Law Center put Maajid Nawaz and Ayaan Hirsi Ali — two activists who have risked their lives to help reform Islam — on a list of “Anti-Muslim extremists.”


Sarah Haider, a co-founder of Ex-Muslims of North America, knows first-hand how hard it can be to criticize Islam without appearing like you’re attacking all Muslims, and she held nothing back going after the SPLC:

In addition to threats of violence by Islamic fundamentalists, liberal critics of Islam are increasingly abandoned. At best, we are inconvenient afterthoughts, at worst, bigots and hate-mongers.

The intellectual confusion and moral paralysis plaguing the Western Left around the religion of Islam has done much to add credibility to the Western Right…

Perhaps in more competent hands, a report such as this may have been a useful guide for journalists with little time to spend on background research. However, the one produced by SPLC is neither reliable nor factual, and often steers closer to the category of yellow journalism than anything worth serious consideration.

In reality, Maajid Nawaz has been one of the most consistently rational, compassionate, and nuanced voices in an atmosphere brimming with hostility and competing agenda-driven narratives. As an apostate myself, I am grateful he represents Muslims who fight for our right to exist.

You could also feel the jaw-drops on Twitter:

The Southern Poverty Law Center, as of this writing, hasn’t responded to any of the complaints. But they have an obligation to defend or apologize for their decision. To call Hirsi Ali and Nawaz “anti-Muslim” — on a list with actual bigots — paints an even larger target on their backs and hurts their efforts to reform the real extremism out there.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!