When It Comes To America’s Treatment of Atheists, Says Author, Women Historically Have It Worse September 19, 2016

When It Comes To America’s Treatment of Atheists, Says Author, Women Historically Have It Worse

Washington University in St. Louis professor Leigh Eric Schmidt has a new book coming out soon called Village Atheists: How America’s Unbelievers Made Their Way in a Godly Nation all about how godless people were treated in our country more than a century ago. He explores those perceptions through the eyes of four people who may well be described as the “New Atheists” of their time.


We’ll be posting a podcast episode with Dr. Schmidt and an excerpt from his book soon, but I wanted to draw your attention to an interview he did with The Atlantic‘s Emma Green because there was a remarkable passage about how difficult it was for outspoken female atheists earlier in our history:

SCHMIDT: In the 19th century, there are more women in the church than men. So there is an association with churches and pious femininity and domesticity. Freethinkers see women as supporters of the church, and supporters of evangelical Protestant politics, whether it’s temperance or other moral-reform causes, so there’s an alienation that arises there. They’re fearful that if women have the right to vote, they’ll vote for Christian-inflected politics. They’re afraid: What’s this going to do? Is this really going to advance the cause of reason, the cause of science, if we give women the right to vote?

GREEN: You talk about the perceived oddness of “woman atheists.” How have the experiences of women who are atheists differed from those of men historically?

SCHMIDT: Because there was such an ideal of pious femininity — women are supposed to be pious, women are supposed to go to church — there was greater horror associated with a woman being an atheist than with a man being an atheist. Male atheists are bad. Women atheists are genuinely considered monsters.

That mentality hasn’t left us entirely. Religion is considered in lockstep with family values, raising children with morals and ethics, sticking to gender roles, etc. So when a man speaks out against faith, it’s easy to think it’s an academic argument, nothing more, take it or leave it. But when a woman speaks out against faith, it’s as if she’s turning her back on family and society, too. That’s unacceptable to many.

How do we fix that? There’s no perfect solution, but bringing attention to non-theistic women who deserve a wider audience and could help shatter those stereotypes is always helpful. It’s something I’ve become cognizant of, anyway, in several years of posting on this site.

It’s just sad how little has changed in American over the past hundred or so years for intelligent women who speak out against religion.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!