Incredibly, Hillary Clinton May Be the Most Religious Candidate Still in the Race for President May 3, 2016

Incredibly, Hillary Clinton May Be the Most Religious Candidate Still in the Race for President

With Ted Cruz dropping out of the presidential race tonight, John Kasich still technically in the hunt but with no real path to victory, and GOP Chairman Reince Priebus dubbing Donald Trump the “presumptive” Republican nominee, an important threshold has been crossed for Secular Americans.

The Religious Right has no clear nominee, and the candidates left standing aren’t the ones who wear their faith on their sleeves.

That means we may finally have a presidential race where religion is left on the cutting room floor. We may have an election where the major candidates aren’t defined by their faith. We’re about to have a campaign where Hillary Clinton is the most religious candidate on the ballot.

Can you believe it?


Consider this:

Trump may say the Bible is the greatest book ever, yet doesn’t know how to say “2 Corinthians.” He doesn’t have a favorite passage. He can’t decide what he likes more: The Old Testament or the part with Jesus in it. He doesn’t ask for forgiveness because he thinks he can do no wrong. He picks fights with the goddamn Pope. He doesn’t want to reach out to the downtrodden; he wants to kick them out of the country.

If he’s trying to play the part of a Christian, he’s a horrible actor. For him, religion is just a tool to help get him elected. He may say he’s religious, but no one’s seriously falling for it.

What about Bernie Sanders? He calls himself Jewish, but it’s a very secular kind of Judaism.

When asked by comedian Jimmy Kimmel about his faith last year, Sanders simply said, “I am who I am.” In January, he told the Washington Post, “I am not actively involved with organized religion.”

During a televised Town Hall meeting on CNN, he gave host Chris Cuomo perhaps the most humanistic answer yet regarding what he believes, repeating a line he said on Kimmel’s show about how we’re all intertwined:

… Every great religion in the world — Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism — essentially comes down to: “Do unto others as you would like them to do unto you.” What I have believed in my whole life — I believed it when I was a 22-year-old kid getting arrested in Chicago fighting segregation — I’ve believed it in my whole life.

That we are in this together — not just, not words. The truth is at some level when you hurt, when your children hurt, I hurt. I hurt. And when my kids hurt, you hurt. And it’s very easy to turn our backs on kids who are hungry, or veterans who are sleeping out on the street, and we can develop a psyche, a psychology which is “I don’t have to worry about them; all I’m gonna worry about is myself; I need to make another 5 billion dollars.”

But I believe that what human nature is about is that everybody in this room impacts everybody else in all kinds of ways that we can’t even understand. It’s beyond intellect. It’s a spiritual, emotional thing. So I believe that when we do the right thing, when we try to treat people with respect and dignity, when we say that that child who is hungry is my child, I think we are more human when we do that, than when we say “hey, this whole world is me, I need more and more, I don’t care about anyone else.” That’s my religion. That’s what I believe in.

And I think most people around the world — whatever their religion, their color — share that belief. That we are in it together as human beings. And it becomes more and more practical. If we destroy the planet because we don’t deal with climate change. Trust me, we are all in it together… and that is what my spirituality is about.

That’s a beautiful answer, and it didn’t include the word “God” once.

And that leaves Hillary Clinton.

Do you even know what her religious label is?

A profile of her faith in the New York Times from January began this way: “Hillary Clinton is Methodist, but she rarely talks about her faith on the campaign trail.”

It’s true. Her form of Christianity is far less overt than even President Obama. In fact, according to a Pew Research Center survey from earlier this year, fewer than half of all Americans believe she’s “very” or “somewhat” religious at all. (Compare that to 59% who said the same about Obama.)

Her religion could easily be mistaken for a kind of Secular Humanism. She lives by the Golden Rule and is inspired by her faith to help other people. She’s pro-choice. She’s for gender equality. Whatever she once was, she’s actively pro-LGBT rights now. She’s also a firm supporter of church/state separation, as she said earlier this year:

To be clear, none of this is to say she isn’t religious, only that it’s the kind of religion that shouldn’t be a concern for atheists.

I would say the same about Bernie Sanders.

And, truth be told, I would say the same about Donald Trump (though we should all be concerned about him for very different reasons).

Consider that we have a President right now who seems to reference his Christianity in every major speech, a man that the Right claimed was secretly a Muslim. He won in 2012 against Mitt Romney, a candidate whose Mormon beliefs were a cause for concern among the GOP faithful. Obama won in 2008 against a ticket that included Sarah Palin, a darling of know-nothing religious conservatives whose Christian beliefs were (and still are) downright scary to everyone else. And all of that comes after eight years of George W. Bush, whose own faith led to so many disastrous policy decisions.

I know it’s still early and we don’t know who the running mates will be in this election. (Sorry, Carly Fiorina.) But it certainly appears to be the case that the religious beliefs of the candidates will not play a significant role in the race from this point forward. We’ll absolutely be talking about religious issues — LGBT rights, “religious freedom” laws, abortion, etc. — but it’d be disingenuous to say the candidates’ faith is the driving force for their positions here.

Meanwhile, all the Republicans who said God wanted them to run for President have now dropped out of the race.

God has spoken, and He clearly wants nothing to do with this election.

It’s about damn time.

(Image via chrisdorney / Portions of this article were published earlier)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!