German Politician Says Muslims Should Be Obligated to Pay “Mosque Tax” April 21, 2016

German Politician Says Muslims Should Be Obligated to Pay “Mosque Tax”

A parliamentarian for Germany’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) wants Muslims living in Germany to pay a religious tax — just like other citizens.


Some quick background: If you’re a German, and you’re Catholic, Protestant, or Jewish, eight or nine percent of your income taxes go to support your place of worship. It’s known as the Kirchensteuer (church tax). The church-allocated tax revenues have been declining year after year, as more Germans swear off religion. Many go out of their way to disassociate themselves from their (former) faith so that they may avoid paying hundreds or even thousands of Euros to an institution they no longer care to support.

Alexander Radwan, a member of the Bundestag, now argues that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. When the law was written, Muslims barely had a presence in Germany. Now that they number more than four million, however, it’s time to treat them the same as all other Germans, Radwan says.

One clear benefit, he argues, is that when German Muslims essentially finance their own religious centers, foreign (Arabic) money flowing to Islamic religious causes in Germany will decrease in influence, and Saudi-style Wahhabism should lose much of its toehold.

Radwan’s proposal comes barely a week after Andreas Scheuer, General Secretary of the Christian Social Union (CSU), said he wants to

… “cultivate” a European kind of Islam in Germany by barring foreign investment from Muslim countries. He told Die Welt daily that German must become the language of the mosques,” among other things.

From where I sit, the Kirchensteuer is a travesty. No government should act as a money-collecting intermediary between theists and their churches. But as long as that questionable law remains in place, yes, it should be applied to all believers.

Note that it’s good to be a German atheist in this case: non-believers get to be on the correct side of the church-tax issue while also saving some serious coin.

(Image via Shutterstock)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!