Muslim Group Blocks Bill Banning Child Marriages in Pakistan for Being “Anti-Islamic,” “Blasphemous” January 18, 2016

Muslim Group Blocks Bill Banning Child Marriages in Pakistan for Being “Anti-Islamic,” “Blasphemous”

President Obama said a few months ago, “If I presented a cure for cancer, getting legislation passed to move that forward would be a nail-biter.” He’s unfortunately right. Political pressure can derail even the most obvious of bills.

That example is hypothetical, but a real example just happened in Pakistan, where a bill to ban child marriages has been blocked by Muslim extremists.


The ruling party politician who introduced the bill, Marvi Menon of the Pakistan Muslim League party, withdrew it after the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) dubbed the bill “blasphemous”.

CII Chairman Mohammad Khan Sheerani said the bill contradicted Islamic teachings.

He said: “Parliament cannot create legislation that is against the teachings of the Holy Quran or Sunnah.”

The Council of Islamic Ideology functions as an advisory group to the Pakistani Parliament, making sure legislation is always compliant with their interpretation of the Qur’an.

The same group said in 2014 that it was okay for girls as young as nine to get married if “the signs of puberty are visible.”

That’s not all:

Its recommendations are non-binding, and it has drawn widespread criticism in the past for other rulings — including in 2013, when it suggested making DNA inadmissible evidence in rape cases, instead calling for the revival of an Islamic law that makes it mandatory for a survivor to provide four witnesses to back their claims.

Why would anyone take their advice about anything? Because the Qur’an. That’s why. It’s the kind of bullshit you expect to see in any nation where a holy book trumps common sense.

(via The Washington Post. Thanks to Gunnar for the link. Image via Shutterstock)

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!