Religious Leaders Recommit to Wrong Side of History Days before Same-Sex Marriage Debate April 26, 2015

Religious Leaders Recommit to Wrong Side of History Days before Same-Sex Marriage Debate

This is a guest post written by David G. McAfee. He is author, most recently, of The Belief Book.

On Thursday, more than 30 religious leaders from various denominations signaled, less than a week before the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on whether same-sex marriage is a right under the U.S. Constitution, that they still support marriage defined as “the union of one man and one woman.”

The group, which includes the president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and 34 other representatives from Evangelical, Anglican, Pentecostal, and Mormon churches, wrote an open letter to elected officials saying that maintaining the status quo is better for the “well-being of children.” This is despite the fact that studies suggest children of same-sex couples may actually fare better and that allowing same-sex marriage could reduce stress and strengthen families.

In the one-page letter, which doesn’t cite any research on the health or well-being of children raised by same-sex couples, USCCB President Joseph E. Kurtz and the other faith leaders say that every child deserves the opportunity “to be raised by his or her own married mother and father.”

Marriage as the union of a man and a woman is the only institution that encourages and safeguards the connection between children and their mother and father. Although this connection cannot always be realized and sustained — and many single parents, for example, are heroic in their efforts to raise their children — it is in the best interests of the state to encourage and uphold the family founded on marriage and to afford the union of husband and wife unique legal protection and reinforcement.

The open letter, called “The Defense of Marriage and the Right of Religious Freedom: Reaffirming a Shared Witness,” was issued to “all in positions of public service.”

Despite the fact that marriages have ancient and untraceable roots — they likely began as a means to form alliances, not out of love — Kurtz and the other Christian leaders insist they want to keep marriage “as it has been understood across faiths and cultures for millennia.”

The redefinition of legal marriage to include any other type of relationship has serious consequences, especially for religious freedom. It changes every law involving marital status, requiring that other such relationships be treated as if they were the same as the marital relationship of a man and a woman. No person or community, including religious organizations and individuals of faith, should be forced to accept this redefinition.

The fact is that marriages have existed in some form or another for essentially as long as human beings have been around. Although many wedding ceremonies have religious references and traditions, the act of marriage itself is not a religious one; it’s a human one.

But even if marriage has been consistently been defined as being between a man and a woman, as the 35 religious leaders and other same-sex marriage opponents suggest, is tradition a good argument against civil rights equality? Historically, we have seen that the answer is, “No.”

I’m reminded of a quote by Arkansas Circuit Court Judge Christopher C. Piazza, who (briefly) invalidated the state’s ban on same-sex marriage and recognition of such marriages performed out-of-state. In his May 2014 ruling, the judge explained why courts must be “especially vigilant” in cases where a group has been subjected to a “tradition of disfavor.”

“Tradition alone cannot form a rational basis for a law,” Piazza wrote. “The fact that a particular discrimination has been ‘traditional’ is even more of a reason to be skeptical of its rationality.”

(Image via @mliu92 on Flickr)

David G. McAfee is a Religious Studies graduate, journalist, and author of The Belief Book, a children’s book explaining the origins of beliefs and religion, and Mom, Dad, I’m an Atheist: The Guide to Coming Out as a Non-believer. He is also an editor for Ockham Publishing and a contributor to American Atheist Magazine. McAfee attended University of California, Santa Barbara, and graduated with bachelor’s degrees in English and Religious Studies with an emphasis on Christianity and Mediterranean religions.

"They're both wonderful story lines--but the witches win."

Christian Blogger: Moms Should Stop Working ..."
"A fitting end. Well, front end."

A Capitol Rioter Was Arrested After ..."
"Got it! And it's hardly just kiddie diddling, although that may be the most heinous ..."

A Capitol Rioter Was Arrested After ..."
"I doubt Sarah cares about anyone but herself."

Sarah Palin: I Would Run for ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!