Conservative Group Sues IRS for Not Turning Over Correspondence with FFRF Regarding Politician-Endorsing Churches November 24, 2014

Conservative Group Sues IRS for Not Turning Over Correspondence with FFRF Regarding Politician-Endorsing Churches

Back in November of 2012, the Freedom From Religion Foundation sued the IRS because of the government agency’s “failure to enforce electioneering restrictions against churches and religious organizations.” Basically, churches were endorsing political candidates from the pulpit and the IRS wasn’t doing anything to stop it. (Part of the problem was that there was a vacancy in the position that normally handled those issues.)

Finally, over the summer, the two sides agreed on a settlement:

“This is a victory, and we’re pleased with this development in which the IRS has proved to our satisfaction that it now has in place a protocol to enforce its own anti-electioneering provisions,” said FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor.

“Of course, we have the complication of a moratorium currently in place on any IRS investigations of any tax-exempt entities, church or otherwise, due to the congressional probe of the IRS. FFRF could refile the suit if anti-electioneering provisions are not enforced in the future against rogue political churches.”

The IRS has now resolved the signature authority issue necessary to initiate church examinations. The IRS also has adopted procedures for reviewing, evaluating and determining whether to initiate church investigations. While the IRS retains “prosecutorial” discretion with regard to any individual case, the IRS no longer has a blanket policy or practice of non-enforcement of political activity restrictions as to churches.

So the IRS said it would finally enforce its own rules. It shouldn’t have taken a lawsuit for that to happen, but there you go. Order was restored.

Since then, we’ve seen another Pulpit Freedom Sunday come and go, with pastors endorsing candidates during sermons, and the IRS has yet to take any direct action against the offending churches. They still have their tax exemptions.

But a right-wing group is convinced there’s some secret alliance between the IRS and FFRF. Because, as we all know, the government is overrun by atheists… even though there’s not a single openly non-religious person in all of Congress.

Earlier today, the group Judicial Watch announced that they had filed their own lawsuit against the IRS. They demanded a record of all correspondence between the IRS and FFRF — to uncover any shenanigans — and the IRS hasn’t sent them anything yet. See?! CONSPIRACY!

“As expressed by the First Amendment, Americans have the God-given right to both express their religious views and to engage in the political process,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is troubling that the IRS seems set to rely on a group of atheists to point them toward churches that might have criticized politicians. And it is even more disturbing that the IRS would violate federal law, The Freedom of Information Act, in order to keep secret its monitoring of Americans praying together in church. To be clear, the very IRS that abused Tea Partiers for Obama’s election now purports to be able to ‘audit’ houses of worship in order to protect politicians from criticism. I am sure the Obama administration is more than happy to use the excuse of a lawsuit by a leftist group to use the IRS to punish churches that oppose Obama’s war on religious freedom.”

Fitton won’t tell the whole truth, so I will: Americans are welcome to express their religious views and engage in the political process — but they can’t do both while part of a tax-exempt church. If churches want to start paying taxes, they’re welcome to endorse all the candidates they want, but they can’t have their cake and eat it, too.

I don’t know why the IRS hasn’t responded to their request — it’s not like FFRF has any control over that — but to suggest that the IRS is secretly monitoring church services is just bullshit… which, unfortunately, is the fuel that drives groups like these.

Not a single church has been punished yet. Unless someone reported a church doing something illegal, and there was evidence of it, no church would get in trouble.

Eventually, I’m sure the IRS will give Judicial Watch the documents they want. And then I suspect they’ll go radio silent because there won’t be anything in those documents that suggests even a hint of wrongdoing.

This is, and always has been, about following the law. FFRF just wants the IRS to do its job. The IRS told them they will do that job. And Judicial Watch somehow thinks that’s inherently anti-Christian.

(Portions of this article were posted earlier)

"" because all it would take to drag them down/have them give up state/company secrets ..."

The Lack of Opposite-Gender Friendships Among ..."
"In all fairness it should be pointed out that Altier also believes crackers turn into ..."

MN Priest Who Said COVID Death ..."
"If for some reason you do lose your faith it will be a totally involuntary ..."

Democrats Do Not Have “Anti-Catholic” Bias, ..."
"masturbation is ok - it sesm even for our miserablte nannybot."

Podcast Ep. 341: The Supreme Court’s ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment