High Court in India Nixes Religious-Disclosure Requirement on Government Forms; Also, “None” is Now Permitted September 24, 2014

High Court in India Nixes Religious-Disclosure Requirement on Government Forms; Also, “None” is Now Permitted

In India, until now, various forms provided by the government asked citizens to disclose their religion — and “none” wasn’t an option. Good news:

In a landmark ruling, the Bombay high court on Tuesday held that the state cannot compel any individual to declare or specify his or her religion, on any form or declaration. Acting on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by three individuals, the division bench of justices Abhay Oka and AS Chandurkar further held that every individual has the right to state that he or she does not belong to any religion and does not practice or profess any religion.

India is a secular democratic republic,” the bench further said. It added that there is complete freedom for every individual to decide whether he or she wants to adopt or profess any religion. “He may not believe in any religion,” the bench said. “If he is professing a particular religion, he can give up the religion and claim that he does not belong to any religion.”

The suit was filed by three unlikely candidates for secularism, at least on the face of it:

Dr Ranjeet Mohite, Kishore Nazare and Subhash Ranaware … said they are members of the organization Full Gospel Church of God, which has 4,000 members. Though the name of the organization hints at a Christian body, the petitioners claimed that the organization does not believe in any religion, much less Christianity.

Huh. Alright then. Anyway, the right to not have to declare a religion is so simple, so elementary, that what the justices wrote shouldn’t have to even be discussed. But they just did, and India’s religionists can put that ruling in their pipe and smoke it.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!