We’re Atheists, We Have Seven Kids (Four of Whom Were Adopted), and We’re All Happy Freethinkers December 11, 2013

We’re Atheists, We Have Seven Kids (Four of Whom Were Adopted), and We’re All Happy Freethinkers

This is a guest post by Veronica Chenik Gilmore.

“You are so blessed”

“You’re an angel”

“Are you Catholic?”

“Are they all yours?”

“God Bless you”

These statements are just a sampling of what people say to my husband and me when they find out we have seven children.

We have a blended family — three biological children and four who came to us from Tennessee through an interstate adoption program. Strangers and casual acquaintances step into our circle to celebrate our “good deed” as if we’re doing something to please God. These well-intentioned people have no clue that we are hiding something very important from them: our identity as atheists.

Most people assume it was our faith that led us to adopt. But after hearing all sorts of mischaracterizations and faulty conclusions about who we are, it’s time for me to speak up. We’re not religious and we’re adoptive parents.

In fact, because I’m a happy Secular Humanist parent, I have chosen to advocate for adopting older children and working through the complexities of interstate adoption. My hope is that we can encourage other secular families to find and take in children of their own. For too long, adoption has been linked with religious groups — not always, but often. That needs to change.

I don’t mind discussing adoption or atheism. The two have a lot in common and, in fact, both subjects can learn a lot from each other. Neither needs to be a secret and I don’t want my kids to be ashamed of either label. However, those labels also don’t define our lives entirely; we are constantly evolving and growing and learning new ways to describe ourselves. (When you have seven kids, the definitions change frequently!) People celebrate adoption and many celebrate their own atheism, but the two worlds rarely intertwine. Both worlds are filled with rejection, intolerance, and misunderstanding. There are angry atheists and there are angry adoptees. We are, however, on the happy end of both spectrums.

When I first discussed adoption with my husband, he assumed I wanted to travel to China to bring home a newly-born baby. It was hard for him to grasp that I wanted to adopt a child and not an infant. I wanted to provide a home for a child who had grown up without one, not mold a child from birth. There’s a stigma against adopting older children (above the age of eight) and, before I even met my children, I had many people tell me why it wouldn’t work.

Each of our kids has struggled with one issue or another regardless of whether they were adopted or not. All kids can be reckless, hurtful, and rebellious, but that’s especially true if the adults in their lives have let them down. It’s upsetting that our adopted children’s biological parents couldn’t have raised these four amazing kids and we’re sad that, in order for our kids to be loved and cared for by us, they had to be separated from their biological parents. Our gain doesn’t make up for their loss. (In a unique twist we have re-established a connection between our kids and their biological parents. Having an open adoption after no contact for a few years is scary for some people, but it has been beneficial for all sides in our case.)

So why did we choose to adopt?

I should start by telling you that my husband never wanted to do it, though he has since become adoption’s biggest advocate. The process took years and, though our biological children were excited at first, the time lapse began to wear on them after a while (Will we ever meet our new brother or sister…?). The romantic idea of adoption is that it happens quickly; the truth is that the length of time from start to finish can vary quite a bit. The average time foster children spend in care is 3.5 years.

My motivation to adopt is complex, though it might help to explain my own background. I was the product of an affair my mother had while she was married. She met my biological father in college and I learned very few details about him when I was younger. I was told he was Russian and Jewish, though he was actually Polish. I was told he was studying to be a physician, when he was actually a psychiatrist. I was told his name, which my mother remembered somewhat incorrectly. So the true story of my own conception was a mystery to both my legal father and biological father until I was an adult, when my mother finally revealed the truth to both of them. I suppose that story could have crippled me, but instead, I feel like I became more compassionate.

The search for my “real” self led me to read many books about adoption. To my surprise, I strongly identified with many of the experiences of adoptees. I, too, had a strong appetite for an “adoption story,” to be reunited with my biological father and seek out cultural, ancestral, and medical information. Though most of the books spoke from a religious perspective, I was able to read around these spiritual findings since I had given up my faith by this time.

During our adoption search, we were approved by three different agencies: our local Department of Social Services (DSS), Lutheran Family Services, and a private therapeutic foster care agency. Each agency served an important purpose during the many years we worked with each of them. For starters, we worked with our local Department of Social Services as respite foster care parents, meaning we gave regular foster parents support or a short break by taking care of their kids for an afternoon or a weekend or longer. During our time as respite parents, we were able to help children and families during times of crisis, without becoming official long-term foster parents. It was like we had adoption training wheels.

During our home-study process, when adoption agencies can assess whether we would make good adoptive parents, we were asked about our religious upbringing, the church we currently attended, and how we would respect the foster child’s culture and potential decision to attend a church different from our own. We never volunteered our atheism, nor were we asked; the social worker did, however, assume that we attended church. I suppose she had no reason to think otherwise — parents always adopt because of their faith, right? At least, both private and state agencies always wanted to know that information. I understand the need for thoroughly vetting a prospective family, but it’s not like they ever asked us about our political affiliations…

We eventually decided the best option would be to avoid mentioning our lack of religious beliefs if at all possible. As a “waiting-to-adopt” family, our atheism was setting us up for a wide range of discrimination and intolerance. While many adoption agencies target all kinds of different parents these days — single, older, interfaith, gay, lesbian, transgender, interracial, etc. — they still tend to ignore secular families. We’re just not on their radar. Since most agencies are funded and run by churches and religious foundations, it is assumed by many staffers, case workers, and social workers that the religious faith of the adoptive family alone means they are worthy of parenting children. Most social workers who came to speak with us (as part of a background check) assumed we attended church. We were firm in telling them that we didn’t, but that we respected the children’s right to make that decision for themselves when the time was right. I worried that our atheism would raise some sort of red flag in these agencies, forever marking us as Unfit to Adopt.

The Gilmores meet Richard Dawkins

Even during the mandatory monthly foster parent meetings, I quickly learned that there was a degree of favoritism and intolerance depending on one’s experience. As a new foster parent, I was eager to share what I was thinking, but I discovered the more religious you said you were, the more popular you became within the group and the more placements you received. I never felt I was able to declare my lack of religious belief to the foster care group because I feared I wouldn’t find any support. Meanwhile, other foster parents freely discussed their religious beliefs and even their disgust with a political party with no hesitation. I have seen the same attitudes in other foster care groups, too. I once declared that I didn’t attend church and that I wasn’t very religious, only to be subsequently invited to the foster parent’s church where her husband was pastor. I declined. After that, I was coldly rejected from the group and other future events. Declaring my difference made me an outcast and never benefitted my family. So I decided it would be better to accentuate my family’s values instead of a particular religious label so that we could steer clear from the religiosity that continues to support those who are believers.

That’s when we began inquiring about kids via AdoptUsKids.com. This website became my go-to resource for adopting children in the United States, specifically older children as opposed to infant adoption, and explained the whole process as well as the more complicated proceedings of an interstate adoption. It taught me that waiting families don’t have to adhere to someone else’s idea of “perfect” in order to adopt.

Because our DSS office didn’t participate in interstate adoptions at the time, we switched to an adoption agency that would provide us with a home study that was recognizable by other state agencies: Lutheran Family Services of Virginia.

By this time, we knew better and didn’t express our lack of religiosity to them, but we stated honestly that we did not attend church. We were approved as adoptive parents with LFS on the basis of our experience and recommendations from the state agency.

That’s when we stumbled upon a potential roadblock.

On February 10th, 2012, the Virginia Senate passed SB 349. Known as the “conscience clause” bill, it was described as targeting LGBT populations in Virginia, but it also declared differences in religion as a factor for adoption. That meant that agencies receiving millions of dollars in state funding could discriminate against families they believed did not fit into their doctrine. I felt our opportunity to adopt disappearing. Words could not express my frustration. I promised my family I would never surrender.

Thankfully, those worries never came to fruition. We soon received a call that we would become parents — to a group of four siblings from Tennessee. We became adoptive parents because we were qualified and we had the qualities that these children needed. We did it without any help from god and without the support from Lutheran Family Services of Virginia. And while we weren’t expecting that many children, we can no longer imagine our lives without each one of them.

Having gone through the process, I would now offer some advice to prospective atheist parents:

  1. Clarify your desire to adopt as a family and seek council with a trusted therapist specializing in adoption.
  2. Read everything you can about adoption, attachment issues, and legal barriers in your state.
  3. Do not let your lack of religious faith detour your goal.
  4. Join an online atheist & Humanist parenting group for (anonymous) support.
  5. Try respite care within a foster care agency first. By offering your services as a caretaker, you can learn what it’s like to help a child cope from a traumatic life event first hand. It’s not easy, but it’s rewarding. It’s also a way to dip your toes into the water of adoption.
  6. Be prepared to be rejected over and over (and over!). Don’t take the process personally.

My husband and I differ about whether or not to disclose one’s atheism to an agency. He believes it’s too soon in our society to be open about it entirely. But I think it’s our duty to be the change. If we don’t speak out, who will?

Before our adoption, we were concerned that, because of our lack of faith, our children might reject us. But our kids accepted our lack of religiousness without a second thought. In fact, they felt very relieved that they wouldn’t have to attend religious studies and meetings or be told what to believe in. Raised in the Bible Belt, these kids now have the freedom to choose about their own paths without judgment. We allow them to challenge our perspectives and debate their own ideas freely in our home, something they were unable to do in the past.

The best part about having a large blended family is that our support for one another helps us explore our own meaning of family; the diversity of everyone’s tragedies and personal challenges have made us stronger and more united. It is this deep resiliency that contributes to our universal happiness. The beauty in creating a family by sharing ourselves has been extremely rewarding. I want this world to be a better place for them and for our many generations of “Happy Gilmores” to come.

You might be wondering if our kids are atheists. Most of them are. But our oldest son spent many years attending friends’ churches just for the sake of debate. We focus on being freethinkers rather than giving them any declarative labels. Our kids all attended religious pre-school (it was the only local option) and/or other religious-based camps in the past and understand a variety of religious beliefs. Most of our kids have also attended Camp Quest, the secular summer camp. Some of them have now gone two years in a row! Both times, they came back from camp energized by their experiences, eager to share ideas and debate with their peers. We also attended the Reason Rally last year.

Two of the Gilmore kids stand next to ‘Jesus on a dinosaur’

Children waiting to be adopted need secure, happy, and creative parents who will let them explore their own identities, deal with losses, and grieve. While adoption has traditionally been the purview of religious families, non-believers need to jump into the mix. All children deserve a home, especially older children, and secular families can do their part in providing homes for them. I encourage you to consider it as a way to really live out your Humanism.

The “Happy Gilmores” are devoted to helping children and families. Veronica is writing a book and a film script about her blended family. You can find them on Twitter and Facebook.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • HappyGilmores

    I understand, I have talked to other women who disclose their atheism in softer terms (?)– I would suspect there is something more *feminine* about using the term Humanist
    vs Atheist? Humanist feels more like you
    ARE for something and the Atheist feels AGAINST something, rather than
    it being feminine or masculine — could also have something to do with a person’s palatable/attraction to the word– one of positivity or negativity per
    se…though I
    feel atheism/secular humanist — they are interchangeable — we are all good without god…anyway, it takes time to build up to own up to the label, and identify with it; it certainly did not happen overnight for me. The subject has been challenged so many times — In previous discussions…Good to see you coming out and being open, I applaud you ( which-ever description you choose!) You have to be happy at work, right? I wish you well — and I can feel the love — right back at you!

  • HappyGilmores


  • HappyGilmores

    As we disclosed we did respite and kept our home available — just in case we we’re matched with an adoption. The children we cared for..left a indelible mark in our life.Yes, you can only hope that you made a small difference in their life as well. Many people say they could never foster care because they would hate to see the children go, and in the beginning – I did indeed feel that way. However I quickly changed my mind and really wanted the kids and families to work things out (if they could) and sometimes, it just was just such a mess. It takes a village : ) Thanks for doing your part! Much love to you and your wife and son– and the three girls!!

  • HappyGilmores

    Have fun making babies!! hahaha! Yes, we are an interesting group! Thanks!

  • HappyGilmores

    Well, thank very much! : )

  • Perhaps, Starship, you should aspire from now on to be what is best in a Muslim –

    O ye who believe! Be ye staunch in justice, witnesses for Allah, even though it be against yourselves or (your) parents or (your) kindred, whether (the case be of) a rich man or a poor man, for Allah is nearer unto both (them ye are). So follow not passion lest ye lapse (from truth) and if ye lapse or fall away, then lo! Allah is ever Informed of what ye do.

    Confound not truth with falsehood, nor knowingly conceal the truth.

    (Show) kindness unto parents, and unto near kindred, and orphans, and the needy, and unto the neighbour
    who is of kin (unto you) and the neighbour who is not of kin, and the fellow-traveller and the wayfarer and (the slaves) whom your right hands possess. Lo! Allah loveth not such as are proud and boastful,

    The way (of blame) is only against those who oppress mankind, and wrongfully rebel in the earth.

  • I’m sorry you assume that to be good, one must be Christian, thus demonstrating how little you know of your own professed denomination.

    You should read your bible someday. You might find it educational.

    Did you know, for example, that the bible doesn’t ban pedophilia, and that the character of ‘god’ repeatedly kills children because he doesn’t like how their parents or some elder of their clan behaved? And that he once played a twisted mind-game on a loyal follower to win a bet and had the guy’s family all die horrible deaths and then let the guy have some more kids later on because kids are totally replaceable? And he also played another mind game on another loyal follower where he tried to get that guy to kill his own much loved son and then he said ‘ha-ha, just kidding, go kill that sheep instead so I can get my bloodlust on?’

    Yeah, that’s totally what we should all aspire to be.That’s completely exemplifying the best and all that. Great role model.

  • HappyGilmores

    Thanks Tom! It’s been a long time coming : )

  • HappyGilmores

    Thank you Lauren!

  • HappyGilmores

    Thanks Ami!

  • HappyGilmores

    as Rogue Medic stated it is not misrepresentation — It’s not illegal to be an Atheist — but some of the agencies have the power to turn families like ours away early in the process — just because we don’t believe the same thing as they do…when you think about it, it’s pretty silly. But in the scope of adoption, some agencies are not very progressive and you can’t fully express everything that defines your family because of the lack of intolerance. The religious sector wants to convince you they are right, and as an atheist I just want to be treated equally, that’s all — I don’t want to to play bible chess or discuss their doctrine, pray or follow their biblical rules…. I just want to help families without judgement.

  • HappyGilmores

    Yes, it’s a lot to think about. There are a lot of older kids who need supportive parents — AdoptUSKids.com is a great website to investigate the process.

  • HappyGilmores

    Yeah, so one could only imagine how different our reality show would be compared to theirs…hilarious.

  • The Starship Maxima

    Completely missing the point. The idea is that it is the WORKS make someone faithful or unfaithful to the teaching of Christ. The degree to which the Samaritans were are weren’t enemies of the Jews is irrelevant.
    re: Within’s quote – As I explained to you, it’s not that faith doesn’t matter. One needs faith in any part of life, religious or irreligious. The point is that that faith MUST culminate in deeds.
    A Christian who says “it’s okay if I don’t do anything, because I have faith,” clearly never read it.

  • The Starship Maxima

    Jesus basically preached the same thing. It IS what I aspire to.

  • Little_Magpie

    I agree and I think you have done a wonderful thing. I was just worrying if the strategy could backfire, is all. 🙂

  • HappyGilmores

    No problem, it was a good question : ) I think people do worry about the legalities in adoption…for example, can the bio parents take them back and so on…and the answer is no. Our adoption was finalized, and the real work begins… in adjusting to the our new family dynamics. I think the headlines are unfortunately laced with the negative stories of adoptions gone wrong and children being displaced and adoption disruptions occurring — Statistically this does occur, but please keep in mind that there are so many different types of adoption. http://statistics.adoption.com/information/statistics-disruption-dissolution.html — I can say that there were many people involved in placing our children in our home, and we fortunately came into the adoption spectrum, educated and aware of what to expect…it has a lot to do with being flexible/creative and having the support your family needs. Our kids had one of the kindest social workers looking out for them — she worked so hard with us — It truly takes a village — I really can’t wait to see what our children do when they grow up, they have an interesting perspective about our family, I definitely have some future writers in our home.

  • nancy Bracy

    When the space ships and very ugly things come at you. I hope you will have the free thinking capacity to deal with it and to appreciate where you will spend eternity. Just saying

  • Good. It’s nice to know you are striving everyday to exemplify what is best in Islam.

    Perhaps someday, you can even aspire to exemplify what is best in Mithras and the other ‘pagan’ faiths that Mohammed and Paul pretty much ripped off when they created their respective myths.

  • Within’s quote says that faith is the only thing that matters. Why are you trying to elide that, and what has made you decide that it isn’t true, since it’s in the very same holy book as the one that argues that works, not faith, is what matters?

    One needs fideist thinking in all parts of life, but not religious faith. Religious faith, that is, believing in things without evidence, is a terrible idea. We don’t need that.

  • Additionally, the bible points out repeatedly that it’s all predestined anyway, with who is ‘chosen’ and who isn’t determined long before you were born. So, neither faith or works actually matter at all. It’s all dependent on where you were born and to whom. Have the misfortune to be born into a land ‘God gave his followers for their inheritance’, and you are just plain fucked, even if you are just a little kid. Whether you from Gomorrah, or Egyptian, or Canaanite, or Amorite, or Midianite, or Heshbon, or Native American, or African, or pretty much just plain old not Judeo-Christian with heavy emphasis on the Christian.

    They’ll even steal your children from you if they don’t approve of you and give them to be raised by whom they view as proper Christian families, after those families give a small donation, of course.

  • Wildcard

    Spaceships? If that is how the world is gonna end that’ll be cool. Sides, I’m prepared with my space-plane. It’s a Fighter Jet that goes in Space.

  • That is an exaggeration. It isn’t clear at all that everything is predestined in either testament. Calvinism is a reasonably new idea and most Christians disagree with it pretty strenuously. I certainly am not going to argue that the only True Christians (TM) are Calvinists!

    Child stealing is also (now) frowned upon. Oh, it most definitely happened quite a lot, and still occurs in some places and by some people, but it’s widely recognized as a bad thing that does tremendous harm.

  • —-That is an exaggeration.—

    Nope, just an example of biblical inanity and inconsistency.

    —-Child stealing is also (now) frowned upon. Oh, it most definitely
    happened quite a lot, and still occurs in some places and by some
    people, but it’s widely recognized as a bad thing that does tremendous

    Yet the church is still resisting coming out and admitting their involvement and/or making restitution for its actions.

    And sadly, yes, such behavior is ongoing in some areas (as is the whole conquering and killing unbelievers/sinners thing), though nowhere near the scale that went on previously.

  • Making restitution would mean parting with money and admitting, out loud, the harm done. You don’t think they’re going to be ethically correct and actually do that, do you? Their god has already forgiven them, after all.

  • Anne

    I’m a single mama to two sons, one bio and one adopted, and have felt very othered by the adoption community because I do not subscribe to a religion, and specifically to christianity. thank you for sharing your story, it is a comfort to know I’m not alone

error: Content is protected !!