New Jersey is Set to Award $11,000,000 in Taxpayer Money to Two Religious Schools, but This Lawsuit May Stop Them June 25, 2013

New Jersey is Set to Award $11,000,000 in Taxpayer Money to Two Religious Schools, but This Lawsuit May Stop Them

Last November, the voters of New Jersey agreed to spend $750,000,000 (PDF) on construction projects at the state’s institutions of higher learning. Combined with other technology and infrastructure funds, that number later jumped to $1,300,000,000.

What we didn’t know was which schools would get how much money.

Last month, Governor Chris Christie’s administration proposed a list of 176 projects at 46 different universities.


The problem was that two of the universities, slated to receive $11,000,000 in taxpayer-approved money in total, were religious:

$10.6 million [is proposed] for Beth Medrash Govoha, an all-male Orthodox Jewish rabbinical school in Lakewood, and $645,313 [is proposed] for Princeton Theological Seminary, a 200-year-old school that trains male and female Christian ministers.

If you think that offering taxpayer money to schools that only admit students of a particular religious faith in order to prep them to become religious leaders sounds illegal… you would be right. So how did this even happen?

The higher education bond bill, introduced last June 14 and co-sponsored by Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) and Minority Leader Tom Kean (R-Union), allowed public and private universities to get funds. Lawmakers said private universities like Seton Hall were eligible, but explicitly excluded “any educational institution dedicated primarily to the education or training of ministers, priests, rabbis or other professional persons in the field of religion.”

Beth Medrash Govoha has long employed one of the top lobbyists in Trenton, Dale Florio, head of Princeton Public Affairs Group, to pursue its interests, Election Law Enforcement records show. Florio met with lawmakers in the Assembly and Senate seeking changes to the bill, records show. Princeton Public Affairs was paid $25,000 by Beth Medrash Govoha last year, according to the firm’s annual report.

On June 21, Sweeney amended the bill and struck the religious exclusion, legislative records show. The amended bill passed both houses days later and voters approved the bond referendum in November.

In other words, money wasn’t going to go to any religious school… until a lobbyist for one of the schools convinced a state legislator to change the rules.

And that’s what brings us to yesterday.

A number of organizations, including Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, filed a lawsuit (PDF) against Rochelle Hendricks (Secretary of Higher Education) and Andrew P. Sidamon-Eristoff (State Treasurer) to prevent the religious schools from getting the money:

“Religious institutions should pass the plate to the faithful, not the taxpayers,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “Clergy training is the responsibility of religious communities, not the government.”

“We support freedom of religion; however the government has no business funding religious ministries,” said Ed Barocas, legal director of the ACLU of New Jersey. “Taxpayers should not foot the bill to train clergy or provide religious instruction, but the state is attempting to do exactly that.”

“As a member of the clergy, I recognize the important responsibility that faith groups have in training their next generation of leaders,” said the Rev. Craig Hirshberg, executive director of UULMNJ. “However, their religious studies should not be funded by taxpayers. When the government financially supports religious groups, it provides privileges to particular religions over others and diverts designated public funds away from programs that should benefit all citizens.

Among other things, the lawsuit calls into question whether lawmakers are adhering to Article 1, Paragraph 3 of the state’s constitution:

nor shall any person be obliged to pay tithes, taxes, or other rates for building or repairing any church or churches, place or places of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes to be right or has deliberately and voluntarily engaged to perform.

The New Jersey legislature can reject the grants through this Friday, but if they don’t act, the money will be disbursed as is. That’s when this lawsuit would kick in.

If the state reps respect their constituents, they won’t waste their money on this lawsuit (which they should lose) and they’ll vote to spend the money strictly on institutions meant for all the citizens, not just the ones who belong to the preferred religions.

(Image via Christopher Halloran /

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!