Atheist Who Wants to Deliver City Council’s Invocation Gets Rejection Letter Because He’s Not Part of a Congregation March 13, 2013

Atheist Who Wants to Deliver City Council’s Invocation Gets Rejection Letter Because He’s Not Part of a Congregation

For a while now, I’ve been writing about the Christian prayers recited at meetings of the Hamilton County Commissioners (in Tennessee):

Tommy Coleman and Brandon Jones filed a lawsuit against them and the case is still being decided, but in the meantime, Coleman has been trying to deliver one of the invocations:

Brandon Jones (left) and Tommy Coleman (Dan Henry – Chattanooga Times Free Press)

He’s been asking for months but the County keeps saying no because he’s not affiliated with any church (as if we needed more proof of their discrimination in action).

This week, Tommy received an official letter (PDF) from the county’s Legislative Administrator Chris Hixson explaining why he’s not allowed to speak:

… the County will add any minister or representative of a congregation/assembly that meets the following qualifications to the “congregations list”:

1) The minister or representative in a congregation/assembly…

2) The congregation/assembly has an established presence in Hamilton County…

3) The congregation/assembly must qualify for tax exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)…

No qualifying congregation/assembly will be excluded from the “congregations list” based on the religious perspectives of the organization, even religious perspectives that do not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God.

In essence, atheists are totally allowed to deliver the invocation… as long as they’re part of a tax exempt church. Which Coleman isn’t.

It’s possible Coleman could qualify if he belonged to a Unitarian Universalist church or even a non-profit atheist group… But, as far as I can tell, there aren’t any in Hamilton County, Tennessee. Which makes it very easy for the Commissioners to pass rules like this designed to promote Christianity as the expense of non-Christians.

It’s the same reason many public high schools like to put a graduation prayer up for a vote by the students — they know Christians are in the majority so they’ll get their way without getting their hands dirty in the process.

It shouldn’t have to come to this. Coleman is right to challenge the invocation prayer. The fact that he’s unable to deliver an invocation because he’s not part of an established church in the area is all the more reason he and Jones should win their case.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!