FFRF’s Newest Billboard: Put Women’s Rights Over Bishops’ Wrongs

So, what does 
Leah Libresco think about it?

She did indicate that she had a lot of soul searching (my term) to do with respect to her decisions.  This may be a topic of such rumination.  I’d actually like to see what she’d say on the matter.

Another awesome billboard! Viva FFRF! 🙂

I’d like to see a “Stop Letting The Catholic Church Mess With Your Head!  I Did!” billboard.
 

Cue screeching about “attacks on the Catholic Church” from Bill Donohue  in 3,2,1…

This is definitely one of FFRF’s best billboards so far. Short and to the point, with a memorable (and quotable!) little barb of a message.

This billboard is as misleading as I have ever seen. The bishops are not trying to have the government enforce their dogma. They are not trying to outlaw birth control. They are simply saying that they should not be compelled by the state to provide it.

We hear so much on this blog about the 1st amendment and freedom of religion but does that only apply to atheists? I’m sure most of you would agree that it does not.

If this is what the FFRF has to offer, either they are incredibly misinformed or are incredibly disingenuous and people should question supporting such an organization. I assume that they are intelligent people so am I wrong for questioning their agenda? Is their goal precisely what their name states? Are they trying to rid the country of religion at the cost of freedom? Is religion so harmful to our society that we should rid ourselves of it at all costs? Should we falsely make religion look so bad (even though it has been an overall force for charity and knowledge) that we make it irrelevant and attempt to eliminate it culturally since we can’t eliminate it by law? Is the misinformation another form of censorship? Instead of placing a black bar across the image we ridicule it and tell lies about it so people think it is nonsense?

If you think for a minute that the bishops wouldn’t outlaw birth control if they could, you are not living in the real world.  Throughout history, whenever the RCC had the power to do so, they used all the force of law and government to impose their doctrines on everyone else.  Relatively recently the church did its best to prevent the legalization of divorce in Ireland, just to name one example.
In this case, they are trying to impose religious doctrine on employees and others who may or may not be Catholics themselves. When they run a charity, or a university, or other entity that does not require employees, students or those helped to be Catholic, and when they receive public money to do so, they are running a secular institution and should be subject to the same laws other secular institutions are. Strictly religious institutions, such as actual churches, or seminaries, are exempt from these requirements.I am sick of the RCC hierarchy, who have a huge influence in politics, much more than they have any right to, pretending to be oppressed because they are being told to abide by the same rules everyone else does. If they want to quit taking taxpayer dollars, and give up their tax-exempt status, they can discriminate to their heart’s content. Until then, not so much.(And yes, religion is so harmful to our society that we should eliminate it, although I certainly would not say “at all costs.”)