What’s the Future of Humanism? June 7, 2012

What’s the Future of Humanism?

By Hemant Mehta
June 7, 2012

What’s the future of faith according to people who practice it? What about the future of atheism and Humanism?

Patheos Press (hi, bosses!) has put out an anthology called Future of Religion: Traditions in Transition (edited by Kathleen Mulhern) that features thoughts about the future of various belief systems.

The Humanism section features contributions by Ron Lindsay, Dave Silverman, some brown guy, and Roy Speckhardt.

It’s a perfect book for anyone who studies world religions and wants to know where adherents of Paganism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and other religions see their faiths going in the next few decades.

Previous Post
Could Kansas be at the Center of Another War on Science?
Next Post
It Could Be the 'Year of Religious Diversity' in Pennsylvania
"They don't even have to worry anymore that it will stick. They know there's a ..."
Kathleen
Televangelist: If Trump Doesn’t Win, Having ..."
"I just had that talk with someone. They pointed out that animals don't give consent ..."
Kathleen
Televangelist: If Trump Doesn’t Win, Having ..."
"Universal health care is so simple. Never having to worry about a medical bill of ..."
This style 10/6
NY Officials: Christian “Health Insurance” Companies ..."
"Instead of voting, they should just pray that Trump wins. I'm sure it'll work out ..."
Kathleen
Televangelist: If Trump Doesn’t Win, Having ..."
Browse Our Archives
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • eonL5

    Well, all of us here like that “brown guy”

    Congrats on the book!

  • Nordog6561

    “The Humanism section features contributions by Ron Lindsay, Dave Silverman, some brown guy, and Roy Speckhardt.”

    Some brown guy?  What, is that like some kinda code for “smiling Mexi-Gay”?

  • BathTub

    So a Silver Man and a Brown Man?

  • The Other Weirdo

    hi, bosses!

    I don’t know if you realize how disturbing that sounds, coming from a supposedly free-from-interference atheist blog. Personally, I think you would’ve been better off on your own. At least then you wouldn’t be providing advertizing for the Mormons.

    But, what do I know?

  • 1) It’s called a joke.

    2) There’s no interference. I write whatever I want.

    3) I had Google ads at the old site. I posted about Mormons so Google presented Mormon ads on the site. That’s how they work. That’s not a Patheos thing.

    4) You know little.