Very amusing, but alas, any kid who actually tried something like that would have gotten a very long, tedious, and serious lecture as a result. Probably after school, with a sadly inane (if not downright painful) homework assignment to follow.
After all, they must prevent any possible talk of dissent.
As long as we’re being pedantic here, that wouldn’t have been pornography unless it was also obscene and without artistic value.
Maybe it makes me a bad atheist, but I usually find comics like this to be about as witty as most creationist comics.
Which is to say, not at all.
Gibbon
That is something that I have never understood about conservative Christians, particularly those with a creationist bent. Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see. To me those people have always looked like hypocrites in that respect.
The MoUsY spell-checker
“Those people more than anyone else tend to be opposed to virtually any display of nudity, and yet they are perfectly fine believing that the first humans were naked and on display for the whole world to see.”
But weren’t Adam and Eve only naked until they ate the forbidden fruit? Afterwards they realised they were naked and covered up with fig leaves because they were ashamed. So, it’s actually consistent for conservative Christians not to have a problem with Adam and Eve’s nudity because it was before the original sin.
