Herb Silverman’s “A Case For Nothing” October 10, 2009

Herb Silverman’s “A Case For Nothing”

This post is by Jesse

I really shouldn’t be on the computer; I should be packing for my trip up to New York for a wedding.  But I wanted to say two things.  Like Hemant and PZ Myers (as well as countless others, no doubt) I read all the comments on my posts.  There was quite an unexpected reaction to my last post, so I looked back and realized I was unclear about my position.  That’s my mistake; I hope to write up a clarifying post this weekend, relatives and ceremonies allowing.

In the meantime, I couldn’t pass up the chance to share Herb Silverman’s most recent post on On Faith.  I found myself wanting to quote too much – it’s a short entry – but I’ll try not to violate copyright law:

A man entered a small courtyard and saw an altar with a large zero in the middle and a banner that said NIL. White-robed people were kneeling before the altar chanting hymns to The Great Nullity and The Blessed Emptiness. The man turned to a white-robed observer beside him and asked, “Is Nothing Sacred?”

It seems that Karen Armstrong and I would agree that nothing is sacred, but from opposite sides of this pun. Ms. Armstrong believes in a god about which or whom you can say nothing, and I see no thing worthy of worship. Our differences are less about supernatural beings than about supersemantical beings. Many liberal religionists define “God” in a way that totally blurs any distinction between theism and atheism, for example, as Nature, the Potential Within, Love, and so forth. One could easily “convert” me, an atheist, into a believer by a judicious definition of a deity, but so what?

Full disclosure: Herb Silverman is the president of my organization, the Secular Coalition for America.  But reading his writing at On Faith, you can see why I would be proud to link to him even if I had a different job.

Check it out and leave a comment for Herb!  Then come back to FriendlyAtheist and talk about how we can reach out to the ‘functional atheists.’

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!