Nontheistic Groups Join Coalition Urging Obama to Disavow Religious Discrimination September 18, 2009

Nontheistic Groups Join Coalition Urging Obama to Disavow Religious Discrimination

A group of organizations that support religious liberty sent a letter (PDF) to Attorney General Eric Holder yesterday. The coalition includes the American Humanist Association, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, American Civil Liberties Union, Interfaith Alliance, Center for Inquiry, and the Secular Coalition for America.

The issue at hand is an Office of Legal Counsel memo from 2007 that states the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (“RFRA”) allows for religious discrimination.

The coalition says the memo was wrong, adding that it “threatens core civil rights and religious freedom protections.”

The OLC Memo wrongly asserts that RFRA is “reasonably construed” to require that a federal agency categorically exempt a religious organization from an explicit federal nondiscrimination provision tied to a grant program. Although the OLC Memo’s conclusion is focused on one Justice Department program, its overly-broad and questionable interpretation of RFRA has been cited by other Federal agencies and extended to other programs and grants. The guidance in the OLC Memo is not justified under applicable legal standards and threatens to tilt policy toward an unwarranted end that would damage civil rights and religious liberty.

The OLC Memo… stands as one of the most notable examples of the Bush Administration’s attempt to impose a constitutionally questionable and unwise policy — RFRA should not be interpreted or employed as a tool for broadly overriding statutory protections against religious discrimination or to create a broad free exercise right to receive government grants without complying with applicable regulations that protect taxpayers.

The coalition wants the Obama administration to review the memo, withdraw it, and then disavow it.

Of course, this group is right. You can’t give federal money to religious groups and then allow them to fire gays, atheists, and anyone else they deem unworthy. If they accept the money, they need to abide by the law, and the law doesn’t allow for that type of discrimination.

Will the administration pay any attention? Obama’s track record on progressives’ issues hasn’t been what I had hoped it would be. But these organizations represent a huge segment of the people who voted for him — liberals are members or supporters of many of the groups on this list.

In any case, it is very cool to see so many organizations working together on this shared agenda item. The more we can stick together, the more affect we’ll have on the political process.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • llewelly

    Good news. But I expect the Obama administration will pay no attention.

  • Miko

    That’s a common myth. As a matter of fact, politicians know that whoever raises the most money wins the election. Voters are just a tool by which dollars express themselves and as such they actually play no essential role in the political process.

    And Obama’s track record with the mega corporations who gave him mega donations is exactly what I feared it would be. For everyone else, his general attitude is one of not really caring. If we manage to get a bill on his desk, he’ll probably sign it. Until then, he won’t give it a second’s thought or aid the process in any way whatsoever.

  • Siobhan in Vermont

    This seems so obvious to me that it’s not worth saying. The contradiction of the people who put such stupid things into effect drives me up the wall. They seek to deny federal funding to organizations that aren’t breaking any laws (clinics that offer abortions), but they want to give funding to organizations that -are- seeking to violate federal anti-discrimination laws. All of this under the rubric of the christian religion. Drives me nuts.

  • muggle

    It would be nice to see but I won’t hold my breath.

  • Instead of saying that this would be nice but we doubt that it will happen, we should be asking “How can I help?” The first thing I plan to do is contact each of these organizations and thank them for their efforts.

error: Content is protected !!