They Won’t Take it Literally… May 22, 2008

They Won’t Take it Literally…

By Guest Contributor
May 22, 2008

Thanks to The New Yorker:

literally.JPG

(via Outchurched)


[tags]atheist, atheism, David Sipress[/tags]

Previous Post
What Does It Mean To Be Human?
Next Post
¿Chicana Atheist?
"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."
larry parker
It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"Is it a Radio Flyer?"
Troublesh00ter
It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."
NotAgain Delightful Bītch
It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"Free ice water at Wall Drug"
Wacker von Wackenfels
It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
Browse Our Archives
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

  • Now that’s pretty funny. Nice find….

    Now where’s the one about the Quran?

  • J Myers

    Now where’s the one about the Quran?

    I think the New Amsterdamer ran that one…

  • Now where’s the one about the Quran?

    Who said that one wasn’t about the Quran?

  • Jason

    Aaron: The halo around one of the figure’s heads implies Jesus.

  • Aaron: The halo around one of the figure’s heads implies Jesus.

    But then we have the problem that Jesus didn’t write the Bible, or anything we know of for that matter. And yes I *may* be over thinking a comic.

  • Vincent

    It wouldn’t be Mohammed because Muslims don’t depict him and thus never use the halo imagery.
    But it could be anyone else since the halo was not used by Christians for the first few hundred years but was used by Buddhists and pagan Greeks.

    I over-think everything.

    But as he’s writing, he’s most likely one of the 4 Gospel writers ( or Q )

error: Content is protected !!