They Won’t Take it Literally… May 22, 2008

They Won’t Take it Literally…

Thanks to The New Yorker:

literally.JPG

(via Outchurched)


[tags]atheist, atheism, David Sipress[/tags]

"I can't read that line about "How's your sex life?" without immediately thinking of the ..."

Is the Church of God Restoration ..."
"Sheesh! Never knew there was a Communion Nazi. Oh, wait, that’s what they’re planning to ..."

U.S. Bishops Move Forward with Plan ..."
"I went to a Mass at a Newman Center where the priest baked his own ..."

U.S. Bishops Move Forward with Plan ..."
"Funny that the folks who say the Bible must be taken literally on everything else ..."

U.S. Bishops Move Forward with Plan ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Now that’s pretty funny. Nice find….

    Now where’s the one about the Quran?

  • J Myers

    Now where’s the one about the Quran?

    I think the New Amsterdamer ran that one…

  • Now where’s the one about the Quran?

    Who said that one wasn’t about the Quran?

  • Jason

    Aaron: The halo around one of the figure’s heads implies Jesus.

  • Aaron: The halo around one of the figure’s heads implies Jesus.

    But then we have the problem that Jesus didn’t write the Bible, or anything we know of for that matter. And yes I *may* be over thinking a comic.

  • Vincent

    It wouldn’t be Mohammed because Muslims don’t depict him and thus never use the halo imagery.
    But it could be anyone else since the halo was not used by Christians for the first few hundred years but was used by Buddhists and pagan Greeks.

    I over-think everything.

    But as he’s writing, he’s most likely one of the 4 Gospel writers ( or Q )

error: Content is protected !!