Tribute to Arthur C. Clarke

By Guest Contributor

March 18, 2008

I never read science fiction, but I know many of you do.

Here’s a tribute to Arthur C. Clarke from Jessica Hagy:

[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Senate Resolution 483: Ten Commandments Weekend

March 19, 2008 Show Some Respect to Ray Comfort

"What can be more religious freedom than a church paying taxes and being free to ..."

Canadian Atheist Group: Churches Breaking COVID ..."

""Just let them talk for awhile. "I have found that with a lot of groups. ..."

guerillasurgeon

Southern Baptists Can’t Escape Politics When Their ..."

"Did you see the phenomenon where right wingers who were supportive of the insurrection while ..."

It’s Not Enough for Progressive Evangelicals ..."

"My argument was that the House didn't even mention "Christianity" as an unindicted co-conspirator to ..."

It’s Not Enough for Progressive Evangelicals ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

MorseCode

My own little tribute to Sir Arthur. If anyone cares to take a look.
GuyMac

Well that is totally wrong. The one circle should be labeled “technology” and the overlapping space “advanced technology” because the law is “advanced technology is *indistinguishable* from magic.”
hoverFrog

What do you mean never read science fiction?
Darwin’s Dagger

Yeah, what kind of self-respecting atheist doesn’t read science fiction?
Renacier

Thats one way to do it, I’m sure, GuyMac. But as it reads now,it says that the effects of some advanced technology and the effects of some magic are overlapping and that overlap can be described by Clarke’s Law.
Perfectly valid and I can’t believe I’m arguing about a Venn diagram of Clarke’s Third Law on the internet. Stereotype, much?