Tribute to Arthur C. Clarke

By Guest Contributor

March 18, 2008

I never read science fiction, but I know many of you do.

Here’s a tribute to Arthur C. Clarke from Jessica Hagy:

[tags]atheist, atheism[/tags]

Senate Resolution 483: Ten Commandments Weekend

March 19, 2008 Show Some Respect to Ray Comfort

"I wish for all of them to enjoy the freedom of masklessness until they get ..."

democommiescrazierbrother

Republican Congressman: “There Is No Such ..."

"> given the present makeup of the Supremes,The Supreme Court of Christian Privilege?"

Montana Man Who Tore Down Ten ..."

"I'm tempted to quote James Elroy Flecker (from Hassan)"And some to Mecca turn to pray,But ..."

Generation Atheist, a Book About Going ..."

"Same in many U.S. states. You're not allowed to have alcoholic beverages accessible to the ..."

Supreme Court: NY Can’t Enforce Strict ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

MorseCode

My own little tribute to Sir Arthur. If anyone cares to take a look.
GuyMac

Well that is totally wrong. The one circle should be labeled “technology” and the overlapping space “advanced technology” because the law is “advanced technology is *indistinguishable* from magic.”
hoverFrog

What do you mean never read science fiction?
Darwin’s Dagger

Yeah, what kind of self-respecting atheist doesn’t read science fiction?
Renacier

Thats one way to do it, I’m sure, GuyMac. But as it reads now,it says that the effects of some advanced technology and the effects of some magic are overlapping and that overlap can be described by Clarke’s Law.
Perfectly valid and I can’t believe I’m arguing about a Venn diagram of Clarke’s Third Law on the internet. Stereotype, much?