I had mentioned that Sam Harris‘ talk at the Atheist Alliance International convention had a divided response. Some people really appreciated it; others didn’t like it at all.
You can now read an edited transcript of his speech here.
Given the absence of evidence for God, and the stupidity and suffering that still thrives under the mantle of religion, declaring oneself an “atheist” would seem the only appropriate response. And it is the stance that many of us have proudly and publicly adopted. Tonight, I’d like to try to make the case, that our use of this label is a mistake—and a mistake of some consequence.
…
Atheism is too blunt an instrument to use at moments like this. It’s as though we have a landscape of human ignorance and bewilderment—with peaks and valleys and local attractors—and the concept of atheism causes us to fixate one part of this landscape, the part related to theistic religion, and then just flattens it. Because to be consistent as atheists we must oppose, or seem to oppose, all faith claims equally. This is a waste of precious time and energy, and it squanders the trust of people who would otherwise agree with us on specific issues.
I’m not at all suggesting that we leave people’s core religious beliefs, or faith itself, unscathed—I’m still the kind of person who writes articles with rather sweeping titles like “Science must destroy religion”—but it seems to me that we should never lose sight of useful and important distinctions.
[tags]atheist, atheism, The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation, Christian, Jesus, religion, Islam, Muslim[/tags]
Scott Lively: I Asked God to ..."
Are You Non-Religious? Then Take the ..."
Scott Lively: I Asked God to ..."
Scott Lively: I Asked God to ..."