Atheist Book Covers March 29, 2007

Atheist Book Covers

With the recent rise of atheist literature, it might be a good time to step back and look at some of the books that have been released.

But first, take a look at the covers of some currently popular Christian books:




What do we notice about them?

Yes, they’re men, clasping their hands. But these covers are very visual. You have something (or someone) to look at. You can’t help but notice them.

Now, let’s look at the covers of popular atheist books:


We kind of see a lighter color at the top… it looks like the sky. The copy I have loses the color gradient altogether– it just has a grey reflective coating. And the word God is in a different color than the other words! Bold. And Dawkins’ picture? Not even on the back cover. Arguably the most famous atheist in the world, but he is resigned to the inside flap.


Another color gradient that gets lighter as we move up the cover. There’s a lot of tinkering with the fonts. Lots of words this time. But still not so appealing visually.


Christopher Hitchens’ upcoming book. Don’t stare at it directly or you will go blind.


We have a woman writing a book! A smart woman! But she’s not on the front. The cover’s appeal is limited to a few stars… and several horizontal lines.


More stars! In vertical lines!


We have a visual breakthrough! One red banner going across the cover. A daring move…


Nica Lalli’s new book. (I’m almost done with it; a review is forthcoming.) But the only touch of color we have is to highlight the word “Nothing.” To be fair, this might be the one case where it’s apt.


Finally, we get some sort of real image! A picture of the world, no less. Very nice.

Why are the covers of atheist books so different from the Christian counterparts?

One explanation might be that the Christian books are driven by personalities. The authors/pastors themselves are the selling points of their books, moreso than their content which is essentially interchangeable.

Atheist books, on the other hand, are less personality-driven and more content-oriented. Because of that, we seem to focus the covers more on the words and less on the imagery.

Maybe atheists could get more publicity and name-recognition if we had some of our own people on the covers. I’ll admit: Sam Harris is a good looking guy. Why is he relegated to an inset on the back cover?

Then again, we atheists pride ourselves on our thoughts, words, and reasoning skills. Not on our ability to look good in a suit. Maybe we don’t want to be characterized as the type of people that would have our own images on the cover.

Still, there must be a way to make these atheist books more alluring to the eye.

[tags]atheist, atheism, Christian, T.D. Jakes, Reposition Yourself, Myles Munroe, Kingdom Principles, Joel Osteen, Your Best Life Now, Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, Sam Harris, The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation, Christopher Hitchens, God is not Great, Susan Jacoby, Freethinkers, Daniel Dennett, Breaking the Spell, Nica Lalli, Nothing: Something to Believe In, Victor Stenger, God the Failed Hypothesis[/tags]

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Aaron

    Weather you “cheery-picked” those christian books or not, they aren’t one but attractive. They are almost wierd, to see some guy smiling at you as you read, not soothing in my opinion. But these atheist books are bright and colorful, so they caught my eyes. When I see one guy on a cover It reminds me of some chessy book that isn’t worth reading, I guess I was right all along 😛

  • AAZ

    Let’s just say:

    “Don’t judge a book by its cover.”

    And leave it at that.

  • F. Gordon Robinson

    I have written two novels both of which are strongly slanted toward atheism, and both of which were inspired by the philosophy of the novelist Ayn Rand.
    The first novel is called “Zeno’s Paradox” and it can be viewed at . The galley copy of the novel, “Hunker Creek’s Gold”, is being sent to me and I should have it shortly. It will appear at during the first week of December.
    If you are interested in reviewing “Zeno’s Paradox”, please advise me by return e-mail.
    I have set out below the short synopsis for each novel that appears on the covers.

    Zeno’s Paradox

    My novel, Zeno’s Paradox, was inspired by the philosophy of the novelist Ayn Rand.

    Howard Rhodes’ father was a renowned physicist. He and his wife were killed in a suspicious car accident when Howard was fourteen years old. Howard is now sixteen and living on his own as an emancipated minor. He is also an intellectually gifted and well-adjusted teenager whose mother stimulated his love for learning, explained Christianity’s fatal flaw to him, and taught him that his most valuable asset was his brain and his ability to reason.

    In school, Howard deals with a challenge from a classmate who is a class bully, and who is making everyone’s life miserable. He also entertains his classmates and stuns his math and physics teachers when he unravels the error in the logic to Zeno’s famous Paradox, which has had scientists baffled since 400 BC.

    Howard’s interest in physics leads him to investigate various possibilities regarding small particles, and he attracts everyone’s attention, including Stefan Nacouski’s who is a sleeper al Qaeda agent living in the United States, when he discovers a new source of energy.

    Not only does Howard’s new source of energy eliminate the need for burning fossil fuels, but also, he can create a particle beam shield that will protect the United States and its allies from a Ballistic Missile attack. Unfortunately, this same device can be refined to create a beam that will silently kill hundreds of innocent people. Stephan will resort to anything to get his hands on Howard’s Killing Machine.

    Hunker Creek’s Gold

    A group of highly trained terrorist snipers are keeping almost every US law enforcement officer busy investigating random attacks. A second arm of the terrorist group is secretly importing and warehousing enormous amounts of narcotics.

    The group’s intention is to flood the US market with drugs at prices anyone can afford. Their aim is to addict as many people as possible including high ranking politicians, business people, law enforcement officers, civil servants, and military personnel. The terrorists predict that this will cause America to grind to a standstill. They plan to step up the random sniper attacks spreading terror throughout United States. And, this will be the signal for the Militant, Right Wing groups’ leaders to band together and agitate for a citizen’s revolt against their government that can no longer protect its citizens.

    Mike Cranston is a trained Navy Seal sniper, and Little John knows all of the Militant, Right Wing groups’ leaders in the country. Together they plan to infiltrate the terrorist group.

    During the summer, Shane Atkins operates his placer mine on Hunker Creek, and he is studying philosophy at the University of Oregon during the off season. He and his mentors are concerned that the moral culture of the United States is in a downward spiral.

    Shane’s lecture series for artists, called the Philosophy of the Nature of Man, attracts the attention of the councilors at the many rehab clinics that have sprung up throughout America. The drug councilors are convinced that his compelling logic in support of a rational basis for ethics, a romantic renaissance in the arts, and man’s efficacy offers a valuable alternative to the Twelve Step program.

  • SpencerDub

    Maybe it’s just the minimalist in me, but I really like the atheist book covers you posted. (And yes, I realize this comment is about two and a half years too late… that’s what you get when you link to an old post on your front page!) I have copies of Freethinkers and The End of Faith in front of me right now, and I find both to have handsome covers.

    Someone already mentioned upstream (and many years ago) how brilliant Dawkins’ cover is. I’d agree. But Jacoby’s is also well-designed– the distressed, grungy font choice and the way the type is laid out says “old Americana” to me, which is entirely appropriate for her subject matter. The End of Faith has less of an obvious meaning to its design, but I think it’s still quite unique and visually appealing. Both Jacoby’s and Harris’ covers indicate to me how you can create compelling visual design using little more than typography.

error: Content is protected !!